RETROSPECTIVE RECORD · PREPARED 16 SEPTEMBER 2026The almanac archive · 100 retrospective records ↗

The almanac archive / Buying guides

Buying guides / From the almanac · 17 November 2022 report · prepared 16 September 2026

An advocacy group's toy survey found recalled toys still for sale

US PIRG's 2022 Trouble in Toyland report bought recalled toys online to test how easy they were to find.

Visual for this record: An advocacy group's toy survey found recalled toys still for sale
Visual published by chienetmoi.com, shown for identification of the record. Credit: chienetmoi.com · source page ↗ Rights: owner-review-pending.

The play

Trouble in Toyland is an annual toy-safety survey published by U.S. PIRG Education Fund, a consumer-advocacy group. Its 2022 edition, released 17 November 2022, calls itself the group's 37th annual report, and the following year's 2023 edition calls itself the 38th, arithmetic consistent with the series having begun in 1986. The 2022 report's headline finding comes from a hands-on purchasing test: researchers bought recalled toys during October 2022 from Facebook Marketplace, eBay, and other online sellers to see whether products already deemed dangerous were still easy to obtain.

What the evidence says

The 2022 report documents its own method: of 26 online listings for recalled toys found between January and October, researchers attempted to buy 16 and succeeded in buying eight, for a total of more than 30 recalled units once multiples are counted. It cites a Consumer Product Safety Commission figure of about 198,000 toy-related emergency-room injuries in 2020, and separately reports the CPSC's own count of 172 toy recalls in 2008 against nine to 28 a year over the prior seven years. The report attributes both figures to the CPSC by name, distinguishing the regulator's injury and recall data from the advocacy group's own purchasing test. The 2023 edition shifts its main focus to smart, connected toys and privacy, showing the survey's scope changes year to year rather than repeating one fixed checklist.

Age fit and safety

The report does not set its own age standard; it cites the CPSC's small-parts rule, which defines a hazardous small part as one that fits inside a test cylinder 1.25 inches wide by 2.25 inches long, sized to the throat of a child under three, and notes that children four and younger consistently make up about half of toy-related emergency-room visits among children 14 and younger. Both figures are attributed to the CPSC within the report, not asserted as the advocacy group's own independent finding.

What to look for

Editorial guidance built on the report: before buying secondhand or marketplace toys, treat a listing marked new in box as no guarantee against a past recall, since the report found recalled stock still routinely available years after a recall notice. A high count of recalled listings for one specific toy is evidence about that product and about marketplace conditions during the survey period, not a finding about an entire manufacturer or toy category.

  • Was this specific toy, not just its brand, ever the subject of a recall notice?
  • Is a marketplace listing selling new stock of something the CPSC has recalled?
  • Does a secondhand toy still have all its original small parts and labeling intact?

An advocacy group's annual purchasing test is not a government enforcement action, but its method of buying real listings and checking them against the CPSC's own recall list is a documented way of estimating how much recalled stock still circulates, worth reading each year on its own terms.

Sources & reading trail

Trouble in Toyland 2022 ↗

37th annual edition; documents the recalled-toy purchasing test, CPSC injury/recall counts, and small-parts rule.

Source published: 17 November 2022 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Trouble in Toyland 2023 ↗

38th annual edition, confirming the report's annual cadence and its shift in yearly focus to connected toys.

Source published: 16 November 2023 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Standards, recall notices, studies and records establish the entry; the what-to-look-for reading is Toy Almanac editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.