RETROSPECTIVE RECORD · PREPARED 16 SEPTEMBER 2026The almanac archive · 100 retrospective records ↗

The almanac archive / Safety & recalls

Safety & recalls / From the almanac · 31 July 2025 event · prepared 16 September 2026

A well-regarded magnet brand still had one model recalled

Tegu's 2025 recall of one Magnetic Floating Stacker model shows why brand reputation is not a model-level check.

Visual for this record: A well-regarded magnet brand still had one model recalled
Visual published by cdn.shopify.com, shown for identification of the record. Credit: cdn.shopify.com · source page ↗ Rights: owner-review-pending.

The play

Tegu makes wooden magnetic building toys, generally marketed around larger, toddler-scale pieces meant to click together through embedded magnets. Its Magnetic Floating Stacker, sold through Tegu's own site, Amazon, and specialty toy stores from August 2018 through April 2025 for about $40, paired a wooden base and six stacking pieces with two posts and two figures connected by magnets. On 31 July 2025, Tegu recalled the toy, according to the company's own recall page and CPSC's recall notice.

What the evidence says

CPSC's notice states the toy violates the mandatory standard for toy magnets because its magnets can loosen and detach, and describes the hazard mechanism in general terms: swallowed magnets that attract each other or other metal objects can perforate, twist, or block the intestines. The notice records 22,850 units affected in the United States, plus smaller numbers in Canada and Mexico, and states Tegu received 31 reports of magnets separating from the toy, with no injuries reported. Tegu's own recall page repeats the hazard description and adds the specific remedy steps: mark the recalled base, photograph it, email the photo with shipping details, and discard the pieces rather than donate them.

Age fit and safety

The recall ties the hazard to the mandatory toy-magnet standard rather than to any age-specific finding; it states no injuries were reported despite 31 detachment reports, distinct from a case where harm has already occurred. The recall covers this specific model only; neither document extends the finding to Tegu's other magnetic building sets, which are separate products under separate model numbers.

What to look for

This is editorial guidance grounded in the notice's own scope. A brand's general reputation for larger, toddler-scale pieces is not a substitute for checking a specific model against CPSC's recall list, since this recall shows a single model from a well-regarded line can fail the current magnet standard. For any magnetic building toy in the house, periodically checking that pieces are still firmly seated, not just checking the box the toy came in, directly applies what this recall's own hazard description points to.

  • Does the specific model number of a magnetic toy in the house appear on any current CPSC recall list?
  • Are the magnets in a wooden or building toy still firmly seated, with none loose or missing?
  • Would a caregiver follow a manufacturer's stated recall steps rather than simply discard a toy quietly?

A recall on one model from a brand known for large, toddler-scale pieces is a reminder that reputation and model-level compliance are different things, and the two documents here describe the second, not a judgment about the brand's broader line.

Sources & reading trail

Tegu Recalls Magnetic Floating Stackers Toys Due to Magnet Ingestion Hazard; Risk of Serious Injury or Death; Violates Mandatory Standard for Toy Magnets ↗

CPSC's recall notice states the model, the 22,850 U.S. units affected, that the toy violates the mandatory toy-magnet standard, and the 31 reports of magnets detaching with no injuries reported.

Source published: 31 July 2025 · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Tegu Recall Information ↗

Tegu's own recall page states the required disposal and reporting steps for the affected Magnetic Floating Stacker and confirms the August 2018 to April 2025 sales window.

Source published: Not established · Retrieved: 16 September 2026

Standards, recall notices, studies and records establish the entry; the what-to-look-for reading is Toy Almanac editorial analysis. This retrospective draft does not imply the site published on the event date.